From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752908Ab1FNOEH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:04:07 -0400 Received: from smtp102.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.41]:32579 "HELO smtp102.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750864Ab1FNOEF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:04:05 -0400 X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- X-YMail-OSG: WnJZFbwVM1lHy5cE0Ix_5Hvb5lV8beo0Y9S1AMX_6SvAAMA RksWcxRf3Z7VSSWHV5zw6TVJhNoP93yFJ9yiXtKtA60Qep6UOR4sGJ6OdsYg .38wY59li5i2YoIjUUr3IncmNeyvIdQG.R4uiVHItdB7lkIJs.wQXIPc9l9w VUKRd_yLt4G5MyoDY.3SWs8L6fFwkQ6jnnapvNrPCYvQL_w0DKI2pxoLZW4l HTP.tmcwbfw1r.Xug3olAUA1tWfjhMdkBnAx5E9PdnGEE6axMC2hl7yhym4u Db40e4Sk1QSizCPAvxoZc8UwHIeqqOKfKA6owq_0VHfm6EB6U96GPejSOvlL ahSB5vzdwjcddyVgK4F4qVGMa X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:04:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Pekka Enberg , "H. Peter Anvin" , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , tj@kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [slubllv7 04/17] x86: Add support for cmpxchg_double In-Reply-To: <20110614080436.GB29900@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20110601172543.437240675@linux.com> <20110601172614.173427964@linux.com> <4DF09827.7070809@cs.helsinki.fi> <4DF6F659.3000109@cs.helsinki.fi> <20110614080436.GB29900@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On 6/11/11 8:02 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > >On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > > > >>Oh, I don't know - but I definitely need more ACKs to even consider > > >>pushing this through slab.git. > > > > > >Any additional ackers out there?;-) > > > > Ingo, ping? Could we have this in -tip so I can pull from there? > > This is blocking me from queuing SLUB performance improvements to > > linux-next. > > hpa, what's your take on this patch? He acked it.