From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
"Taneja, Archit" <archit@ti.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"R, Sricharan" <r.sricharan@ti.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OMAP2PLUS: DSS: Ensure DSS works correctly if display is enabled in bootloader
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:34:34 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110031126090.4611@utopia.booyaka.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E898468.2060508@ti.com>
+ devicetree-discuss, lkml
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> But at that time, device tree was not there...
> Now, the whole dev_attr stuff will be replaced because device tree is able to
> provide the driver any kind of custom information that can be retrieved
> directly from the driver without having to use a pdata in between. So I'm not
> sure it worth spending too much time on that feature stuff.
>
> As an example here is the ongoing GPIO DT migration:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg56505.html
>
> 3.2 will have the basic DT support using hwmod as a backend, but the idea is
> that for 3.3, we start removing some information from hwmod to rely on device
> tree only.
One comment here though -- and I will make this comment on the original
series too -- is that we should avoid adding direct DT dependencies into
the driver.
Specifically, these of_get_property() and of_property*() calls in the
driver aren't right.
We need some way of doing this that is completely independent from the
device data format. Some way that does not care whether the input data is
coming from DT, platform_data, ACPI, or whatever the new flavor of the
year will be next year. Or we need to declare that these of_*() calls are
not DT-specific, and define them as hooks that the device data format code
can handle as it pleases.
Otherwise we'll need shim layers for each new data format in the driver
code and that will be a huge and unnecessary mess.
- Paul
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1315811306-11001-1-git-send-email-archit@ti.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110022237171.4611@utopia.booyaka.com>
[not found] ` <1317630070.2026.27.camel@deskari>
[not found] ` <4E898468.2060508@ti.com>
2011-10-03 17:34 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
2011-10-04 18:27 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1110031126090.4611@utopia.booyaka.com \
--to=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r.sricharan@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®