From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753567Ab1JJRND (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:13:03 -0400 Received: from smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.44]:33741 "HELO smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752525Ab1JJRNB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:13:01 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: yrNozBAVM1nhqUkC_dE_BZVPv096ZdrJHgo1UmH7La1Wv2t wU0LetrUM0hXo5rcHHOKG_4L0oghMkbt_shUAP3mnG_Ec2RLm7D7I4m_I4M0 zQ.A0LhurSHhv_qFGmN4GfGyzTSNjz6GBjE20M1rj_1H1cuBQTryTa9HfI4_ M4_XgiWbI8rr0FCpbrD6QSlWMe.l3Y2rT37dKk5fj0Mtkv.7W7eYtAB6pFpj .WcbUpf7Sh.LTyspmO32X_ZdeDhPtj6G.TBamMdLLSwTLjJ1NE_ZF4UeOjrt e5sxZFLSsmXiMeivQ5odQUFh3EiuhhBMTUZfPOdHavsRNzFJRflUNBGbU9SD aERRkN_hURJeKsX2woLZVUjx1xGYRjFfudZao4olmCcXnkCR_A9jr..UpFtM DkoLgEKgi9L6CPUJkGm.eNi8- X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:12:57 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: "Alex,Shi" cc: Pekka Enberg , "Chen, Tim C" , "Huang, Ying" , Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] slub Discard slab page only when node partials > minimum setting In-Reply-To: <1318141715.27949.144.camel@debian> Message-ID: References: <1315188460.31737.5.camel@debian> <1315357399.31737.49.camel@debian> <4E671E5C.7010405@cs.helsinki.fi> <6E3BC7F7C9A4BF4286DD4C043110F30B5D00DA333C@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1315442639.31737.224.camel@debian> <1315557944.31737.782.camel@debian> <1316765880.4188.34.camel@debian> <1317290032.4188.1223.camel@debian> <6E3BC7F7C9A4BF4286DD4C043110F30B5FD97584A3@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1318141715.27949.144.camel@debian> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Alex,Shi wrote: > I tested multi-threads loopback netperf on our machines, no clear > regression or improvement find on our NHM-EP/NHM-EX/WSM-EP machine. What are your criteria for a regressio? > but on our 4 sockets tigerton machine with 2048 clients, performance > increase 20% for TCP_RR subcase, and 10% for TCP_STREAM32 subcase; > and on our 2 sockets harpertown machine, the TCP_RR subcase increase > 15%. > > The data is quite good! Sounds encouraging.