From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756382Ab1KKO5Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:57:24 -0500 Received: from smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.46]:44743 "HELO smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751284Ab1KKO5W (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:57:22 -0500 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ZnkTsN8VM1nT76U.dF6gt50TrNoJ6pIaP687N15zS3Ro8kk qkf1xHbuDSubN5UiUL9SbkfkZUX7RmjhqAZpEIWvefzNO80wWF2HrJBXW.8G Yf.nZ8LTJYKAhzjNP.2URZOiMjmKNjv9HcYi_BzDMF3PIg65U186MXKnHCK7 uvzDDnt3ChbHhPlqS66HPcLVwHkqoA3m466gGP4Dbju7Xv7AHlmisNoETl8v .tOxnt2tqMz4d81Vl6SxLAvdIlxAmi11Zg7J3mfedH5eFuz_a2McnGYU2TNV 1cQQNfexvMeDgKV4t5doD.7zvEEiXm.Kp0MUUBBtJrIlFXxQvY1NDdu3Wy6O axox0JGMwZhWdAVUYIgnEBJPRM2nh021ZFbSh6O53Nd2M72ftlK9iv.dbvli zVlAs3.BAKAlfZum.kCbj X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:57:19 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: Yong Zhang cc: Shaohua Li , Julie Sullivan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Pekka Enberg , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: INFO: possible recursive locking detected: get_partial_node() on 3.2-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20111111044202.GA21013@zhy> Message-ID: References: <20111109090556.GA5949@zhy> <201111102335.06046.kernelmail.jms@gmail.com> <1320980671.22361.252.camel@sli10-conroe> <20111111044202.GA21013@zhy> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Looks like a false positive. put_cpu_partial() can be called with a parameter to indicate if draining of the per cpu partial list should be allowed ("drain"). Draining requires taking the list lock. "drain" is set to 0 when called from get_partial_node() (where we are already holding the list lock) so no deadlock should be possible.