From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754343Ab2EAUXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 16:23:48 -0400 Received: from smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.44]:31308 "HELO smtp105.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752100Ab2EAUXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 16:23:47 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: .QAG3o8VM1kWCJHgauDq0Gc7VKmW2Lp_9dF9SmEZecpQTLy 4MzRNWv4hh6vZ7uVFsgWAK12px9GgnzulU0WzOLikqjAtbb3jXt5riBvXy0g vH3B2LwAvmdvp1TQP5Io0tpsTpWYrDzSUXsAMsFv3P79wGKTdGgeEnt3Z.tg EGX926u1p8T0TRah_BOwDxLtbEEqFWLgYNeSFNDFph8Jbq1mqCvReYxnV5Eh SPpK7W.C3OvCLu0ycds0pOeAT9iusJRYyeVk9DvEcWFteQl6HhuU3bfAHeOk oYp_NT5kYa_RnO__kNYwZ2qjMjCn5oNPEfBhTGqCxq7g67HIX2mWnuMJwl5w yM2.HSTSLvTlv6BtDdePtjf6XIzEEv3en5lWuBDPt76TZ6Qv9IsBRCb0ILwI B5ee1YXgdi8ZfUWzlj_SYTGXxcoqKsS0YVBQa X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:23:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: Pekka Enberg cc: Waiman Long , "mpm@selenic.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Morris, Donald George \(HP-UX Cupertino\)" , David Rientjes , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: prevent validate_slab() error due to race condition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1335466658-29063-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <4F9AFD28.2030801@hp.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > > Thank for the quick response. I have no problem for moving the node-lock > > taking into free_debug_processing. Of the 2 problems that are reported, this > > is a more serious one and so need to be fixed sooner rather than later. For > > the other one, we can take more time to find a better solution. > > > > So are you going to integrate your change to the mainline? > > Christoph, can you send the patch with an improved changelog that also > explains what the problem is? Will do so once I get back from the conference I am at. > How far back in the stable series do we want to backport this? This only affects slab validation when running with deubgging so I would suggest to merge in the next cycle.