From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753774AbZLXMBK (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:01:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751472AbZLXMBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:01:09 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:56048 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbZLXMBH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:01:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:01:04 -0800 (PST) From: Christian Kujau To: CoolCold cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.28.10 - kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:725 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+gyrACt3phoLwmgFxMC/TSJvc9VSGedm8Me38 JRZVgbFnZ4idRqV8lmvvv0oAThEGBxrxLGhqxq3sl1sKFC0ggp x/8V3I4e1wCYCpMzhhWxg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 at 14:09, CoolCold wrote: > 3 days ago LA on server become very high Was the higher load caused by "real" work, i.e. were there more processes running than usual or did the load increase "just so"? > bug - kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:725! . Googling didn't provide me with > exact answer is it bug or hardware problems, something similar was Did you check for hardware problems? Running memtest for a day would be a good start, I think. If the load did increase "just so" and the machine (and the same kernel) were stable before, it's most likely hardware related. Christian. -- BOFH excuse #102: Power company testing new voltage spike (creation) equipment