From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751531Ab1FOFrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:47:13 -0400 Received: from mail.lang.hm ([64.81.33.126]:53790 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231Ab1FOFrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:47:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:46:36 -0700 (PDT) From: david@lang.hm X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Rob Landley cc: LKML , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: When does torvalds/linux-3.git show up? In-Reply-To: <4DF7D0AE.3000301@landley.net> Message-ID: References: <4DF7D0AE.3000301@landley.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Rob Landley wrote: > Are we still going to pull linux 3.0 from the 2.6 repo indefinitely? > (Or does it get renamed to just "linux", or...) > > Just wondering. (Also, having a git://git.kernel.org/linux.git symlink > to Linus's tree wouuld be awesome. I have to look it up again every > time I clone to a new box, and it's down the list a ways...) the current plan is to leave it as the linux-2.6 repo, but there may be a symlink created. David Lang