From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: should CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL be so easily deselectable?
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:06:06 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171756470.4381@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
long story short: in updating to a slightly newer hand-rolled
kernel (2.6.39-rc7 -> 3.0.0-rc3) on my ubuntu system, i somehow (no
idea how) managed to deselect CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL without realizing
it. the consequences of this were that sound suddenly disappeared
under the new kernel, for a fairly obvious reason -- ALSA needs ACLs
under /dev to give R/W access to the user to the device files under
/dev/snd/.
as i said, i have no idea how i managed to do this but i eventually
tracked it down, re-selected that option, rebuilt and i have sound
again. but i noticed that in fs/Kconfig, that option is independently
selectable from TMPFS, so it's (as i learned) deviously easy to
deselect, with annoying consequences.
more to the point, given the apparent necessity of ACLs under /dev
for proper sound operation, the help info for that option seems a bit
misleading:
config TMPFS_POSIX_ACL
bool "Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists"
depends on TMPFS
select TMPFS_XATTR
select GENERIC_ACL
help
... snip ...
If you don't know what Access Control Lists are, say N.
yeah, i think that help line might not want to dismiss tmpfs ACLs
quite so quickly. thoughts?
rday
p.s. i do notice a fairly recent change to that config file related
to this:
commit 4db70f73e56961b9bcdfd0c36c62847a18b7dbb5
Author: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 25 19:49:18 2011 -0700
tmpfs: fix XATTR N overriding POSIX_ACL Y
Choosing TMPFS_XATTR default N was switching off TMPFS_POSIX_ACL,
even if it had been Y in oldconfig; and Linus reports that PulseAudio
goes subtly wrong unless it can use ACLs on /dev/shm.
Make TMPFS_POSIX_ACL select TMPFS_XATTR (and depend upon TMPFS),
and move the TMPFS_POSIX_ACL entry before the TMPFS_XATTR entry,
to avoid asking unnecessary questions then ignoring their answers.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-17 22:06 Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2011-06-17 22:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-17 23:24 ` Robert P. J. Day
2011-06-18 0:28 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171756470.4381@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®