From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753462Ab2B0Gww (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:52:52 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:61004 "EHLO mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752125Ab2B0Gwu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:52:50 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,489,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="146156594" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:52:47 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Dan Carpenter cc: Lionel Debroux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: move const pci_device_id tables from __devinitdata to __devinitconst. In-Reply-To: <20120227061300.GC4763@mwanda> Message-ID: References: <791782.71473.bm@smtp128.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20120227061300.GC4763@mwanda> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:15:29PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote: >> Based on PaX and earlier work by Andi Kleen. >> >> Patch against current Linus tree. >> > > Always write patches against linux-next. We can't apply this. > > I wonder if we could make a coccinelle script for this. It should be possible at some point - at the moment it rases some parsing problems. I wonder if it would be nicer to always use PCI_VEND_DEV? julia > > regards, > dan carpenter >