From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752440Ab2G0Q0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:26:06 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:64520 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752128Ab2G0Q0E (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:26:04 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,668,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="13739250" Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:25:09 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell CC: Stefano Stabellini , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , "Tim (Xen.org)" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] xen/arm: compile blkfront and blkback In-Reply-To: <1343382495.6812.127.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Message-ID: References: <1343316846-25860-18-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1343382495.6812.127.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:34 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > +#define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_ARM "arm-abi" > > I wonder if we ought to call this arm-aarch32-abi or something? So aarch64 has just been renamed to arm64 and you want to rename arm-abi to aarch32-abi? :-) > I wonder if we can also take the opportunity to fix the ABI cockup for > disks on ARM and make the structs the same for both 32 and 64 bit? I think it should be a separate patch, but I'll try to come up with one