From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932352Ab2HVKal (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:30:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:30170 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932094Ab2HVKac (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:30:32 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,808,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="14122459" Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:30:09 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Attilio Rao , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , "mingo@redhat.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1345580561-8506-1-git-send-email-attilio.rao@citrix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote: > > Differences with v1: > > - The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following > > a plan by Thomas Gleixner > > - The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct > > - The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner, > > Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the > diffstats of the two series: > > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > versus > > 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look > at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy > and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is > the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :) > > I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip. They are OK by me. Konrad?