From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758922Ab3BSVV0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:21:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:51011 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758861Ab3BSVVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:21:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:21:22 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: liguang cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c In-Reply-To: <1360894992-14818-2-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <1360894992-14818-1-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1360894992-14818-2-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, liguang wrote: > srat table should present only on acpi domain, > seems mm/ is not the right place for it. > > Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu > Signed-off-by: liguang This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next. Which tree are you basing this on?