From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [RFC] arm: use PSCI if available
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:22:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1303271753130.4430@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1303271321290.1372@syhkavp.arg>
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On 03/27/2013 11:23 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Would you agree on a patch that moves virt_smp_ops out of mach-virt and
> > > > renames them to psci_smp_ops (maybe to arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp_ops.c)?
> > > >
> > > > Would you agree on initializing psci from setup_arch, right after the
> > > > call to arm_dt_init_cpu_maps()?
> > > >
> > > > Finally the most controversial point: would you agree on using
> > > > psci_smp_ops by default if they are available?
> > > > If not, would you at least agree on letting Xen overwrite the default
> > > > machine smp_ops?
> > > > We need one or the other for dom0 support.
> > >
> > > It should not be *always* use PSCI smp ops if available, but use them
> > > only if the platform does not define its own smp ops.
> >
> > Well, that is the one additional problem that we have on Xen.
> >
> > On x86 Xen replaces a lot of core native function calls with its own
> > implementations (see paravirt_ops).
> > On ARM we only need *one* set of calls: the smp_ops calls.
> >
> > So if we don't want to give priority to PSCI over the platform smp_ops,
> > then we need a simple workaround just for Xen in common code like the
> > one appended below.
> > Not pretty, but at least small:
> [...]
>
> What about the patch below that I'm carying in my MCPM branch
> which has been posted here already:
It's a step in the right direction but it still wouldn't solve the
problem.
Let me describe the scenario again:
- we have a versatile express machine with Xen running on it (or an
exynos5, etc.);
- Xen boots Linux as Dom0, passing a versatile express device tree with
the Xen hypervisor node added to it;
- Linux is booting, using the versatile express device tree for hardware
discovery;
- Linux can access the hardware described in the device tree because Xen
remapped the MMIO regions appropriately;
- Linux needs to bring secondary cpus up, but Xen only exports a PSCI
interface, so the native versatile express smp_ops don't work;
- Linux needs to detect that PSCI is available (or Xen is available with
its set of xen_smp_ops) and preferable on this platform and uses it
instead of the versatile express smp_ops.
> From: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:23:13 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time
>
> Add a new 'smp_init' hook to machine_desc so platforms can specify a
> function to be used to setup smp ops instead of having a statically
> defined value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> index 308ad7d6f9..c01bf53b85 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@ struct pt_regs;
> struct smp_operations;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define smp_ops(ops) (&(ops))
> +#define smp_init_ops(ops) (&(ops))
> #else
> #define smp_ops(ops) (struct smp_operations *)NULL
> +#define smp_init_ops(ops) (void (*)(void))NULL
> #endif
>
> struct machine_desc {
> @@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ struct machine_desc {
> unsigned char reserve_lp2 :1; /* never has lp2 */
> char restart_mode; /* default restart mode */
> struct smp_operations *smp; /* SMP operations */
> + void (*smp_init)(void);
> void (*fixup)(struct tag *, char **,
> struct meminfo *);
> void (*reserve)(void);/* reserve mem blocks */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 3f6cbb2e3e..41edca8582 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -768,7 +768,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> arm_dt_init_cpu_maps();
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> if (is_smp()) {
> - smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp);
> + if(mdesc->smp_init)
> + (*mdesc->smp_init)();
> + else
> + smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp);
> smp_init_cpus();
> }
> #endif
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 12:50 Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-27 13:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-27 16:20 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27 13:38 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 16:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-27 16:35 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27 17:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-27 17:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-27 18:22 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2013-03-27 17:45 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27 18:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-27 18:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-27 17:23 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-28 12:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-28 14:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-28 15:04 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-28 15:36 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-28 15:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-28 16:00 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-28 16:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-28 16:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-28 18:38 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-29 13:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-29 13:54 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-29 14:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-27 16:33 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27 17:05 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 17:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-27 18:12 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-27 19:10 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27 19:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-27 14:55 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1303271753130.4430@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®