From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 18:03:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305081712390.18865@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518A7836.4030705@arm.com>
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 08/05/13 16:41, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Register the runstate_memory_area with the hypervisor.
> > Use pv_time_ops.steal_clock to account for stolen ticks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - use BUG_ON and smp_processor_id.
> > ---
> > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > index 13609e0..dfa7738 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@
> > #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> > #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -152,6 +155,19 @@ int xen_unmap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_unmap_domain_mfn_range);
> >
> > +unsigned long long xen_stolen_accounting(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct vcpu_runstate_info state;
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(cpu != smp_processor_id());
> > +
> > + xen_get_runstate_snapshot(&state);
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(state.state != RUNSTATE_running);
> > +
> > + return state.time[RUNSTATE_runnable] + state.time[RUNSTATE_offline];
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __init xen_percpu_init(void *unused)
> > {
> > struct vcpu_register_vcpu_info info;
> > @@ -169,6 +185,8 @@ static void __init xen_percpu_init(void *unused)
> > BUG_ON(err);
> > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
> >
> > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> > +
> > enable_percpu_irq(xen_events_irq, 0);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -300,6 +318,10 @@ static int __init xen_init_events(void)
> >
> > on_each_cpu(xen_percpu_init, NULL, 0);
> >
> > + pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_stolen_accounting;
>
> What guarantee do we have that this is done before the rest of the
> kernel calls paravirt_steal_clock()?
That's not a problem: paravirt_steal_clock is not called unless
paravirt_steal_enabled or paravirt_steal_rq_enabled are set. Also
steal_clock is always increasing so loosing the first few updates is not
an issue.
> What if we have Xen support enabled but don't run as a Xen guest?
That's fine as long as the Xen runstate_memory_area interface is
available.
Usually I am a great fun of feature flags, so that every feature can be
dynamically enabled or disabled and an hypervisor interface can be only
partially implemented.
However the runstate_memory_area is very old and I would consider it
one of the core interfaces that need to be available in order to claim
"Xen compatibility".
> > + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_enabled);
> > + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_steal_rq_enabled);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > postcore_initcall(xen_init_events);
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 13:50 [PATCH v3 0/4] xen/arm: CONFIG_PARAVIRT and stolen ticks accounting Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] xen: move xen_setup_runstate_info and get_runstate_snapshot to drivers/xen/time.c Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 17:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-08 18:13 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-09 8:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2013-05-08 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] kernel: missing include in cputime.c Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 16:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-05-08 16:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-08 16:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-05-08 17:03 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2013-05-09 8:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1305081712390.18865@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®