From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758843Ab3FCPea (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:34:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:14447 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756526Ab3FCPeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:34:24 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,793,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="28900965" Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:34:20 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini CC: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "marc.zyngier@arm.com" , Will Deacon , Ian Campbell , Russell King - ARM Linux , Olof Johansson , Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] xen/arm: CONFIG_PARAVIRT and stolen ticks accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 May 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > I am starting to be pretty confident about this patch series. > > Please advice on what tree I should use to get this stuff upstream: most > of the changes are Xen specific, but it also contains few generic ARM > changes (the introduction of CONFIG_PARAVIRT and paravirt.c on ARM) and > a couple of lines in kernel/sched/cputime.c (a missing include). ping?