From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
<xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-gnttab: do not add m2p override entries for blkback mappings
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:13:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311131253310.4714@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52835646.5040907@citrix.com>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 13/11/13 01:48, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
> >
> > Commit 5dc03639 switched blkback to also add m2p override entries
> > when mapping grant pages but history seems to have forgotten why
> > this is useful if it ever was.
> >
> > The blkback driver does not need m2p override entries to exist
> > and there is significant overhead due to the locking in the m2p
> > override table. We see about a 10% improvement in IOP rate with
> > this patch applied running FIO in the guest.
> >
> > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1590932 for a full
> > analysis of current users.
>
> I think it would be better if it was made clearer what
> m2p_add/remove_override() is for (i.e., allowing get_user_pages_fast()
> to work) so there isn't this confusion in the future. Please add some
> comments for this and move the calls into the gntdev driver.
Even though get_user_pages_fast is obviously the most important use case
for the m2p_override, it is not the only one, see below.
> As a prerequiste, the call to dma_mark_clean() in xen_swiotlb_unmap()
> needs to be removed and replaced with a comment explaining why this now
> differs from the generic implementation. i.e., the necessary
> phys_to_virt() will not work for foreign pages
Actually it is machine_to_phys that is not going to work and only on x86.
machine_to_phys is going to be fine for foreign pages on ARM.
Let's be clear about this: without the m2p_override on x86
xen_swiotlb_unmap is going to fail and that undeniably is a mistake.
However it is a mistake that happens not to cause any problems today.
In fact the following comment is not right:
+/* override is used to add m2p override table entries when mapping the
+ * grant references. Currently there are only two callers to this function,
+ * blkback and gntdev. gntdev needs all grant mappings to have corresponding
+ * m2p override table entries but blkback currently doesn't. This is because
+ * blkback can gracefully handle the case where m2p(p2m(pfn)) fails with
+ * foreign pfns. If you cannot handle this correctly, you need to set
+ * override 1 when calling the map and unmap functions.
+ */
I would add the following comment to xen_unmap_single instead:
/* On x86 xen_bus_to_phys is going to fail for foreign pages unless they
* have been added to the m2p_override. Only gntdev currently adds them to
* the m2p_override, while blkback does not. As a consequence any foreign
* pages mapped by blkback and used for DMA are not going to be unmapped
* correctly here. Fortunately this is not a problem because this function
* is actually a nop for non-swiotlb pages on x86.
*/
> and dma_mark_clean() is a nop on all Xen supported architectures.
That's true, it should be removed. It is just confusing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 1:48 Anthony Liguori
2013-11-13 2:01 ` Matt Wilson
2013-11-13 10:36 ` David Vrabel
2013-11-13 13:13 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2013-11-13 10:43 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1311131253310.4714@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®