From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752191Ab3LKTPX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:15:23 -0500 Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:2648 "EHLO hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751084Ab3LKTPS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:15:18 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:16:59 -0800 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:15:16 -0800 From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: pwalmsley@tamien To: Thierry Reding CC: Mikko Perttunen , Arto Merilainen , Terje Bergstrom , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: clk_round_rate() can return a zero upon error In-Reply-To: <20131211151908.GC31617@ulmo.nvidia.com> Message-ID: References: <20131211151908.GC31617@ulmo.nvidia.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > Perhaps unsigned long long would be a better choice for future > compatibility? Yes - at this point am planning to go straight to u64. - Paul