From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755157Ab3LRPGZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:06:25 -0500 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:22928 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754908Ab3LRPGY (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:06:24 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,508,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="85765743" Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:05:46 +0000 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Stefano Stabellini , , , , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 03/12] xen/pvh: Early bootup changes in PV code. In-Reply-To: <20131218145852.GC4934@phenom.dumpdata.com> Message-ID: References: <1387313503-31362-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1387313503-31362-4-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20131218145852.GC4934@phenom.dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > If so, does it make sense to check for it at run time too? > > > > I think I might as well rip that out - as that code won't be ever > touched. And perhaps just stash in a BUG with /* PVH: FIXME */? That would be fine.