From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932180Ab3L3T7B (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:59:01 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:56920 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932094Ab3L3T67 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:58:59 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,575,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="51042059" Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:58:55 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6 To: Johannes Berg cc: Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Emmanuel Grumbach , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits In-Reply-To: <1388429761.4410.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Message-ID: References: <1388427307-8691-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <1388427307-8691-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> (sfid-20131230_182319_112673_F481A1D3) <1388429761.4410.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add > it when we take the patch ... Sorry. Not sure why that happened. I'll look into it. > Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that > struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a > structure that contains at least two more bytes")? What kind of reorganizing could happen? Do you mean that the programmer might do at some time in the future, or something the compiler might do? julia