From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753468AbaBGVNK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:13:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:33723 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbaBGVNI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:13:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:13:06 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Fengguang Wu cc: Tejun Heo , Filipe David Borba Manana , Chris Mason , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [btrfs] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038 In-Reply-To: <20140207121038.GA1690@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20140207023801.GC11051@localhost> <20140207121038.GA1690@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > > [ 1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests > > > [ 1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests > > > [ 2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2299.967 MHz > > > [ 292.084537] kthreadd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x3000d0, order=1, oom_score_adj=0 > > > [ 292.086439] kthreadd cpuset= > > > [ 292.087072] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038 > > > [ 292.087372] IP: [] pr_cont_kernfs_name+0x1b/0x6c > > > > This looks like a problem with the cpuset cgroup name, are you sure this > > isn't related to the removal of cgroup->name? > > It looks not related to patch "cgroup: remove cgroup->name", because > that patch lies in the cgroup tree and not contained in output of "git log BAD_COMMIT". > It's dying on pr_cont_kernfs_name which is some tree that has "kernfs: implement kernfs_get_parent(), kernfs_name/path() and friends", which is not in linux-next, and is obviously printing the cpuset cgroup name. It doesn't look like it has anything at all to do with btrfs or why they would care about this failure.