From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] arm/unwind: fail on unwind in irq disabled regions
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:57:45 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402132355360.21991@ionos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390580663-28869-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 988 bytes --]
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Mostly unwind is done with irqs enabled however SLUB may call it with
> irqs disabled while creating a new SLUB cache.
>
> I had system freeze while loading a module which called
> kmem_cache_create() on init. That means SLUB's __slab_alloc() disabled
> interrupts and then
>
> ->new_slab_objects()
> ->new_slab()
> ->setup_object()
> ->setup_object_debug()
> ->init_tracking()
> ->set_track()
> ->save_stack_trace()
> ->save_stack_trace_tsk()
> ->walk_stackframe()
> ->unwind_frame()
> ->unwind_find_idx()
> =>spin_lock_irqsave(&unwind_lock);
>
> I would prefer not to turn this into a raw lock so for now it will just
> fail if it is called with irqs disabled which might return a few "empty"
> traces…
If we really end up with unwinding then the few cycles to follow the
stack are not that important anymore. We really want that output.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 16:24 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-02-13 22:57 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-02-14 20:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1402132355360.21991@ionos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®