Re: [patch 07/26] pci: pcie-designware: Remove irq_desc abuse

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
> >> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> >> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>
> >> >> Cc: pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >>
> >> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series.
> >>  I don't have any pending changes in this area.
> >
> > I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it
> > up as well. Either way is fine.
> 
> I never know what to do with these.  I suggested that you pick it up
> so the whole series would be together, because I assumed it would make
> more sense in the git history to have all these similar changes
> grouped together.  But maybe that really doesn't matter.
> 
> What's the recommended practice?

Dunno. There is no rule. I'll merge it up with the rest of the lot.

Thanks,

	tglx