mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Ringle, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Ringle@gridpoint.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to build with -O3
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:32:26 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403050230120.24331@jringle-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140305050927.GA8534@kroah.com>

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:01:49PM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote:
> > +config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED
> > +    bool "Optimze for speed (-O3)"
> > +    help
> > +      Enabling this option will pass "-O3" to gcc
> > +      resulting in a larger kernel (but possibly faster)
> 
> Are you sure about that?  Have you measured it?

(Resending this message, since it was "destroyed". Hopefully, this is now 
an an acceptable form :)

I do know that there is an improvement performance-wise for my particular 
use-case.

My target is an ARM board being built with gcc-4.8.2. My board has on it a 
sc16is740 that is used as an RS-485 port. The sc16is740 is on the i2c bus, 
so when an interrupt comes in to indicate that there is data available to 
be read, I need to get the data over the i2c bus. I do this on a kthread 
to do this work. The i2c transactions (using i2c-davinci driver) are also 
interrupt driven. I was seeing a lot of lost packets when receiving data 
at only 19200. Adding the -O3 compile option helped in this regard in that 
I am now rarely seeing packet loss.

Jon
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-05  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-05  0:01 Jon Ringle
2014-03-05  5:09 ` Greg KH
2014-03-05  5:37   ` Jon Ringle
2014-03-05  6:08     ` Greg KH
2014-03-05  6:19       ` Jon Ringle
2014-03-05  6:31         ` Greg KH
2014-03-05 18:14         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-03-06 13:28     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-03-07 12:39       ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-03-07 12:42         ` Richard Weinberger
2014-03-07 12:51           ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-03-07 13:48             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-03-05  7:32   ` Jon Ringle [this message]
2014-03-06  4:43     ` Greg KH
2014-03-05  7:36 jon
2014-03-06 12:28 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1403050230120.24331@jringle-ubuntu \
    --to=jon@ringle.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Ringle@gridpoint.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®