From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754583AbaFNHk4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:40:56 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:4353 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754207AbaFNHkz (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:40:55 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,476,1400018400"; d="scan'208";a="67150544" Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:40:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6 To: Joe Perches cc: Dan Carpenter , Andrew Morton , Andy Whitcroft , LKML , Julia Lawall , benoit.taine@lip6.fr Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Attempt to find unnecessary 'out of memory' messages In-Reply-To: <1402502500.6169.5.camel@joe-AO725> Message-ID: References: <1402419340.30479.18.camel@joe-AO725> <20140611074704.GS5015@mwanda> <1402502500.6169.5.camel@joe-AO725> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org With a semantic patch that searches for the various calls and then a string containing the letters "emory", I get removals of the messages below. Do any of these messages look useful? For example, some are generated with specific functions, such as IRDA_ERROR or BT_ERR. If none of the messages look useful, should just one big patch go to trivial, or should the patches go to the individual maintainers? julia