From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754520AbaHFWnB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:43:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:35605 "EHLO mail-pd0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753533AbaHFWm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:42:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:42:57 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Josh Triplett cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, platform, kconfig: move kvmconfig functionality to a helper In-Reply-To: <20140806223909.GA14575@jtriplet-mobl1> Message-ID: References: <20140806222419.GA2566@jtriplet-mobl1> <20140806223032.GA3517@jtriplet-mobl1> <20140806223909.GA14575@jtriplet-mobl1> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > The new mergeconfig helper makes it easier to add other partial > > > configurations similar to kvmconfig. > > > > > > Based on a patch by Luis R. Rodriguez . > > > Originally-Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez > > > > > > Modified to make the helper name more general than just virtualization, > > > and factor out more of the common file path. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > > > > For the original patch from Luis: > > Suggested-by: David Rientjes > > > > For this patch: > > Acked-by: David Rientjes > > > > Thanks for generalizing this part of the Makefile, after it's merged it > > will make Luis's set reduce down to a single change. > > Thank you as well for suggesting this refactoring; I should have thought > to do the same rather than copying and pasting the contents of > kvmconfig. > > Should this go in via Andrew's -mm tree, or via tip for x86? > The answer could be "both", if Ingo doesn't pick it up then Andrew sometimes picks it up and sends them along later.