From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751704AbaHKLpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:45:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:61567 "EHLO mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbaHKLpP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:45:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 04:45:12 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Guenter Roeck cc: David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Do not use BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked()) In-Reply-To: <1407731491-22446-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: References: <1407731491-22446-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote: > spin_is_locked() always returns false in uniprocessor configurations > and can therefore not be used with BUG_ON. Replace it with > assert_spin_locked(), which exists for that very purpose. > It may be helpful to assess whether any of these sites should be converted to lockdep_assert_held() so they have no cost when lockdep isn't enabled but still reveal problems when debugging.