From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "tcp: refine TSO autosizing" causes performance regression on Xen
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 17:36:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504091729160.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428596218.25985.263.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 16:46 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found a performance regression when running netperf -t TCP_MAERTS from
> > an external host to a Xen VM on ARM64: v3.19 and v4.0-rc4 running in the
> > virtual machine are 30% slower than v3.18.
> >
> > Through bisection I found that the perf regression is caused by the
> > prensence of the following commit in the guest kernel:
> >
> >
> > commit 605ad7f184b60cfaacbc038aa6c55ee68dee3c89
> > Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > Date: Sun Dec 7 12:22:18 2014 -0800
> >
> > tcp: refine TSO autosizing
> >
> >
> > A simple revert would fix the issue.
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas on what could be the cause of the problem?
> > Suggestions on what to do to fix it?
>
> You sent this to lkml while networking discussions are on netdev.
>
> This topic had been discussed on netdev multiple times.
Sorry, and many thanks for the quick reply!
> This commit restored original TCP Small Queue behavior, which is the
> first step to fight bufferbloat.
>
> Some network drivers are known to be problematic because of a delayed TX
> completion.
>
> So far this commit did not impact max single flow throughput on 40Gb
> mlx4 NIC. (ie : line rate is possible)
>
> Try to tweak /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes to see if it
> makes a difference ?
A very big difference:
echo 262144 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
brings us much closer to the original performance, the slowdown is just
8%
echo 1048576 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
fills the gap entirely, same performance as before "refine TSO
autosizing"
What would be the next step for here? Should I just document this as an
important performance tweaking step for Xen, or is there something else
we can do?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-09 15:46 Stefano Stabellini
2015-04-09 16:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-09 16:36 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2015-04-09 17:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-13 10:56 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2015-04-13 13:38 ` Jonathan Davies
2015-04-13 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 13:43 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 16:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:23 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:41 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:55 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 18:19 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 20:08 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:04 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 18:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 8:56 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16 9:20 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-16 10:01 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16 12:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 11:03 ` George Dunlap
2015-06-02 9:52 ` Wei Liu
2015-06-02 16:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 9:22 ` David Laight
2015-04-16 10:57 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-04-15 18:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 4:20 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-16 4:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 11:39 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16 12:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 13:00 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1504091729160.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®