mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "tcp: refine TSO autosizing" causes performance regression on Xen
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 17:36:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504091729160.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428596218.25985.263.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 16:46 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I found a performance regression when running netperf -t TCP_MAERTS from
> > an external host to a Xen VM on ARM64: v3.19 and v4.0-rc4 running in the
> > virtual machine are 30% slower than v3.18.
> > 
> > Through bisection I found that the perf regression is caused by the
> > prensence of the following commit in the guest kernel:
> > 
> > 
> > commit 605ad7f184b60cfaacbc038aa6c55ee68dee3c89
> > Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > Date:   Sun Dec 7 12:22:18 2014 -0800
> > 
> >     tcp: refine TSO autosizing
> > 
> > 
> > A simple revert would fix the issue.
> > 
> > Does anybody have any ideas on what could be the cause of the problem?
> > Suggestions on what to do to fix it?
> 
> You sent this to lkml while networking discussions are on netdev.
> 
> This topic had been discussed on netdev multiple times.

Sorry, and many thanks for the quick reply!


> This commit restored original TCP Small Queue behavior, which is the
> first step to fight bufferbloat.
> 
> Some network drivers are known to be problematic because of a delayed TX
> completion.
> 
> So far this commit did not impact max single flow throughput on 40Gb
> mlx4 NIC. (ie : line rate is possible)
> 
> Try to tweak /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes to see if it
> makes a difference ?

A very big difference:

echo 262144 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
brings us much closer to the original performance, the slowdown is just
8%

echo 1048576 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
fills the gap entirely, same performance as before "refine TSO
autosizing"


What would be the next step for here?  Should I just document this as an
important performance tweaking step for Xen, or is there something else
we can do?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-09 15:46 Stefano Stabellini
2015-04-09 16:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-09 16:36   ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2015-04-09 17:07     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-13 10:56     ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2015-04-13 13:38       ` Jonathan Davies
2015-04-13 13:49       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 13:43         ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 16:38           ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:23             ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:29               ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:41                 ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:52                   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:55                     ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:08                       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 18:19                         ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:32                           ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 20:08                             ` Rick Jones
2015-04-15 18:04                     ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 18:19                       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16  8:56                         ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16  9:20                           ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-16 10:01                             ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16 12:42                               ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 11:03                                 ` George Dunlap
2015-06-02  9:52                                 ` Wei Liu
2015-06-02 16:16                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16  9:22                           ` David Laight
2015-04-16 10:57                             ` George Dunlap
2015-04-15 17:41               ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-15 17:58                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-04-15 18:17                   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16  4:20                     ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-16  4:30                       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 11:39                     ` George Dunlap
2015-04-16 12:16                       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 13:00                       ` Tim Deegan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1504091729160.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®