From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752684AbbKBHUa (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:20:30 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:19980 "EHLO
	mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752069AbbKBHU2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:20:28 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,233,1444687200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="185524742"
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:20:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6
To: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kbuild-all@01.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: firewire-lib: fix compare_const_fl.cocci
 warnings
In-Reply-To: <56370A2B.6080402@sakamocchi.jp>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511020819390.2096@localhost6.localdomain6>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511020751450.2096@localhost6.localdomain6> <56370A2B.6080402@sakamocchi.jp>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Nov 02 2015 15:55, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Move constant to the right of binary operators.
> > 
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/compare_const_fl.cocci
> > 
> > CC: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
> > ---
> > 
> > Depends on personal taste, but the modified version does look a little
> > nicer to me, since one can better see the relationship between the fdf
> > and sfc fields.
> > 
> >   amdtp-am824.c |    2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- a/sound/firewire/amdtp-am824.c
> > +++ b/sound/firewire/amdtp-am824.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int amdtp_am824_set_parameters(struct am
> >   	if (err < 0)
> >   		return err;
> > 
> > -	s->fdf = AMDTP_FDF_AM824 | s->sfc;
> > +	s->fdf = s->sfc | AMDTP_FDF_AM824;
> > 
> >   	/*
> >   	 * In IEC 61883-6, one data block represents one event. In ALSA, one
> 
> Could I request explainations about the advantage of this modification? I
> cannot imagine good reasons for this subtle changes...

I put the reason under the --- (better see the relationship between fdf 
and sfc).  But if you think the code makes more sense as it is, just 
ignore the patch.

julia