From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751601AbcFVTr7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:47:59 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:1153 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbcFVTr4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:47:56 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,509,1459807200"; d="scan'208";a="182204248" Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:47:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@localhost6.localdomain6 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" cc: Julia Lawall , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de, ming.lei@canonical.com, stephen.boyd@linaro.org, deepa.kernel@gmail.com, chunkeey@googlemail.com, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, jslaby@suse.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, hauke@hauke-m.de, broonie@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, markivx@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mmarek@suse.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3 3/8] coccicheck: enable parmap support In-Reply-To: <20160622151024.GR25646@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20160621203958.GU25646@wotan.suse.de> <20160621212839.GZ25646@wotan.suse.de> <20160621213906.GC25646@wotan.suse.de> <20160621221454.GF25646@wotan.suse.de> <20160622151024.GR25646@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Actually, it would be probably good to raise the default chunksize a bit > > for the latter reason. It would depend on which files get assigned to > > which chunks though how much benefit it might have. > > What value do you have in mind? Or should we leave this as a separate future > change? It's not urgent. Experiments would have to be done to find a good tradeoff. If the value is too large, there is the risk of a load imbalance at the end. julia