From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758079AbaEPRwa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 13:52:30 -0400 Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.96]:55048 "EHLO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756949AbaEPRw2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 13:52:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:52:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Frederic Weisbecker cc: LKML , Kevin Hilman , Lai Jiangshan , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Tejun Heo , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask In-Reply-To: <1400257015-28222-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1400257015-28222-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1400257015-28222-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 May 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > It works on a lower-level than the per WQ_SYSFS workqueues cpumask files > such that the effective cpumask applied for a given unbound workqueue is > the intersection of /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/$WORKQUEUE/cpumask and > the new /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/cpumask_unbounds file. Why is there "virtual" directory in the path? Workqueues are "virtual" devices?