Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your
> > > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree
> > > based on your git tree I'll have to do some manual stuff but that is
> > > certainly possible.
> > 
> > I'd actually prefer against something like the v3.15-rc8 tag, just so
> > that the tree is otherwise "pristine".
> > 
> > > Also, this 'obviously' does not have the normal tip build coverage,
> > > because I usually rely on the tip build robots to do that. But it does
> > > build and run for all my local machines.
> > 
> > It would be great to have Davidlohr go over it too, and if possible
> > have it run through the build robots. [...]
> 
> The build/boot robots found breakage and that is why its first 
> iteration was removed, I didn't have fundamental objections.

I'll queue Peters lot up and we let Davidlohr and Fengguang lose on
it. I run it through my own machinery, so that should work out. ok?

Thanks,

	tglx