mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Brad Mouring <bmouring@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 7/7] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:45:11 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406102244080.5170@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140610134745.668c8a4e@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:41:39 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
>  
> > > On the loop back around, have something like:
> > > 
> > > 	if (top_waiter) {
> > > 		if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
> > > 			goto out_unlock_pi;
> > 
> > 	The task has at least one pi waiter.
> >  
> > > 		if (!requeue &&
> > > 		    top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) {
> > > 			if (!detect_deadlock)
> > > 				goto out_unlock_pi;
> > > 			else
> > > 				requeue = false;
> > > 		}
> > 
> > 	Errm? if requeue is off we are in deadlock detection chainwalk
> > 	mode. So all we care about is whether task is blocked on
> > 	next_lock or not.
> 
> Actually that was a typo on my part. That should have been:
> 
> 	if (requeue &&
> 		...
> 
> As we don't need to read the task_top_pi_waiter() again.

     if (requeue ...

is completely pointless as the code you were talking about is in the

   if (!requeue) {

branch. So what?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 20:28 [patch V3 0/7] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 1/7] rtmutex: Deobfuscate chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10  3:21   ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 13:57   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 2/7] rtmutex: Clarify the boost/deboost part Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:22   ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 14:04   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 4/7] rtmutex: Siplify remove_waiter() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:35     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10  3:44     ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 14:10   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 3/7] rtmutex: Document pi chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:45   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:51     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10 14:21   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 5/7] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  4:03     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10 17:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 6/7] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  1:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 15:09   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 7/7] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  1:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:48     ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 17:41     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10 17:47       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 20:45         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-06-10 14:57   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-10 15:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 17:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10 17:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 20:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:27 ` [patch V3 0/7] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  0:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:00     ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1406102244080.5170@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bmouring@ni.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®