From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752755AbaFMTnf (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:43:35 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:50239 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588AbaFMTne (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:43:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:43:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/10] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic In-Reply-To: <20140613131928.061636e7@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: References: <20140611182944.108526809@linutronix.de> <20140611183853.644673097@linutronix.de> <20140613131928.061636e7@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:44:08 -0000 > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > - rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, next_lock, NULL, task); > > + rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL, NULL, > > You dropped next_lock here. Was that intentional? I doubt it. Definitely not. Thanks for spotting it.