mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 10/10] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:46:15 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406132143480.5170@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140613132810.3d59fdc0@gandalf.local.home>

On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:44:09 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Nit pick, but we should be consistent.
> 
> The requeue path does:
> 
>         next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
>         /*
>          * Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk
>          * decision below.
>          */
>         top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
> 
> I know the order is not important, but we should keep the two the same,
> helps in review and making sure changes to one implementation still
> make it to the other, without confusing those making the changes
> (like you in a few years ;)

The timespan for forgetting about that is measured in weeks, if at
all. No sane brain will keep itself exposed to this longer than
absolutely necessary.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-13 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-11 18:44 [patch V4 00/10] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 02/10] rtmutex: Simplify rtmutex_slowtrylock() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12  3:34   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-13 15:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 01/10] rtmutex: Plug slow unlock race Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 15:41   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-16  8:06   ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 03/10] rtmutex: Simplify and document try_to_take_rtmutex() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 16:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 04/10] rtmutex: No need to keep task ref for lock owner check Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 16:30   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 05/10] rtmutex: Clarify the boost/deboost part Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 16:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 06/10] rtmutex: Document pi chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 16:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 07/10] rtmutex: Simplify remove_waiter() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 16:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 08/10] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 17:10   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 09/10] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 17:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-13 19:43     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 18:44 ` [patch V4 10/10] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 17:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-13 19:46     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-06-22  8:45 ` [patch V4 00/10] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Ingo Molnar
2014-06-22  9:20   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1406132143480.5170@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®