From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754159AbaFPHoy (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:44:54 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:55621 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890AbaFPHow (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 03:44:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:43:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Daniel Lezcano cc: Matthias Brugger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, grant.likely@linaro.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, florian.vaussard@epfl.ch, jic23@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch, silvio.fricke@gmail.com, heiko.stuebner@bq.com, olof@lixom.net, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, arnd@arndb.de, robherring2@gmail.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com, shawn.guo@freescale.com, anders.berg@lsi.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] clocksource: Add support for the Mediatek SoCs In-Reply-To: <539E116D.6030002@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <1402490055-15197-1-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <1402490055-15197-3-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <539E116D.6030002@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/11/2014 08:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > +static void mtk_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, > > > + struct clock_event_device *clk) > > > +{ > > > + struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt = to_mtk_clk(clk); > > > + > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_stop(evt, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + > > > + switch (mode) { > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC: > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_setup(evt, evt->ticks_per_jiffy, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, true, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > + break; > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT: > > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, false, GPT_CLK_EVT); > > > > Why start the timer here? The code will call set next event right away. > > > > > + break; > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED: > > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN: > > > + default: > > > + /* No more interrupts will occur as source is disabled */ > > > + break; > > > + } > > > +} > > > > Looks good otherwise. > > Hi Thomas, > > Can I consider the 8.1 patch (the one taking into account your comment) as > acked-by ? Yes