From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752115AbbCDVH6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:07:58 -0500
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:45271 "EHLO
	mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751051AbbCDVH4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:07:56 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:07:54 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Chen Gang <762976180@qq.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make CONFIG_MEMCG depend on CONFIG_MMU
In-Reply-To: <20150304192836.GA952@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1503041304480.22344@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <1425492428-27562-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20150304190635.GC21350@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> <20150304192836.GA952@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:

> Does it really make sense to do this minor tweaks when the configuration
> is barely usable and we are not aware of anybody actually using it in
> the real life?
> 

If the memcg kmem extension continues to be improved, I'm wondering if 
anybody would want to use memcg only for kmem limiting.