From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932702AbbCYQIE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:08:04 -0400 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:63832 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753166AbbCYQH5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:07:57 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-7d-5512dd5aac83 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:07:45 +0100 (CET) From: Paul Osmialowski X-X-Sender: p.osmialowsk@AMDC1262.digital.local To: David Herrmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Mack , Djalal Harouni , linux-kernel , Lukasz Skalski , Paul Osmialowski Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kdbus: move all kdbus headers to include/linux/kdbus In-reply-to: Message-id: References: <1427297835-19978-1-git-send-email-p.osmialowsk@samsung.com> <1427297835-19978-2-git-send-email-p.osmialowsk@samsung.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7pRd4VCDXZ3clk0/X3FYjGv9SiL RfPi9WwWc841Mllc3jWHzWLCmwPMFit/b2dzYPfYOesuu8f+uWvYPVb8OsLu0bdlFaPH501y Htt3L2cJYIvisklJzcksSy3St0vgyrj54zJTwWL2iubzs5kbGO+xdjFyckgImEicubGYHcIW k7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAUkaJI/fbGUESQgIfGSVWLjAHsVkEtCUmd19mA7HZBAwlbv4/zAjRrC/x 89dDsEEiAloSG+fNZwIZxCzQxCSxcmUrM0hCWMBXYumRTWBFnALBEi+nbwQbxCvgIbHw3ENm iM3nGCUWL5/MApIQFdCVOPTvD1SRoMSPyffA4swClhI9Z1YwTWAUmIUkNQtJagEj0ypG0dTS 5ILipPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkND+uoNx6TGrQ4wCHIxKPLwRSkKhQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiY lUR4d24CCvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamCsfar20/3L/l/HCnielp33/Cl6b//Eyi0r 5E6G7/Nd9TNr5Yn3a1hP8K590XJTc0e9x97tZz89CzIp77GK36zQwtbUpLpej3fuucal/1Mf 3vAOr/74wqWIUSlk8jm1Ws5J6tMYvFyeFVTGOSltN9/hpvZhXsL563P5jBY/9vsaa7ZnY/6l s822SizFGYmGWsxFxYkARcEshEsCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, First of all, I'm sorry for this no-subject covering letter. Accidents never happen only in a perfect world. On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, David Herrmann wrote: > > I'd prefer if we only move the required structure definitions into a > separate header. There is no reason to export all internal entry > points. > You're right, this would definitely look nicer. > > Anyway, this is a technicality that actually depends on the > implemented LSM hooks. So I'd prefer if we discuss that in combination > with the actual LSM patches. I'm not entirely sure which parts are > needed. For testing-purposes, we can always use -I./ipc/kdbus/, right? > Yes we can, which makes whole this patch a bit premature. However, we can't predict whether someone may want to use kdbus headers for any other purpose. As for now, I don't see immediate need for this apart from implementing LSM callbacks. Thanks, Paul