Re: RFC: kernel coding style: prefer array to &array[0] ?

[Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>]

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:54:29PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Joe Perches wrote:
> > > It seems most in-kernel uses are 'array' rather than '&array[0]'
> > >
> > > Most of the time, using array is simpler to read than &array[0].
> > >
> > > Exceptions exists when addresses for consecutive members are
> > > used like func(&array[0], &array[1]);
> >
> > I use '&array[0]' when I want to get a pointer to a single object that
> > happens to be the first one in an array.
>
> Yeah.  Of course, you're right.  Otherwise it ends up confusing static
> checkers if you want the first element or the whole array.
>
> >
> > > Should this preference be put into checkpatch and/or CodingStyle?
> >
> > How about the following low-hanging fruit?
> >
> >   foo(..., &array[0], ARRAY_SIZE(array), ...)
>
> Yes, to this also.  I doubt checkpatch.pl will find a meaningful number
> of these but doing that is annoying thing.

Atcually, I find 236 of them, in 48 files.

julia