From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934129AbbI1PHd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:07:33 -0400
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:44779
	"EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933483AbbI1PHc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:07:32 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,603,1437429600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="148827372"
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned
 variable
In-Reply-To: <56094646.2010301@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509281707010.3181@hadrien>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509261106040.2737@hadrien> <1443437687-16559-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <56092D7B.4030106@users.sourceforge.net> <56092E98.9000103@samsung.com> <560930A7.2070400@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509281440320.3108@hadrien>
 <560938D6.70305@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509281512510.3148@hadrien> <56094646.2010301@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> >> Can the Coccinelle software work together with a kind of "precompiled
> >> header database"?
> >
> > There is an option --use-cache, which caches the compiled code
> > on the disk.  But I have not found the effects to be very satisfactory.
>
> I am curious if this situation will be improved by further software evolution.

There are no plans in that direction.

julia