From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754747AbcITUFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:05:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:33146 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754642AbcITUFc (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:05:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:05:27 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Piotr Kwapulinski cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, liangchen.linux@gmail.com, nzimmer@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode In-Reply-To: <20160920155601.GB3899@home> Message-ID: References: <20160918112943.1645-1-kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com> <20160920155601.GB3899@home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote: > > There wasn't an MPOL_LOCAL when I introduced either of these flags, it's > > an oversight to allow them to be passed. > > > > Want to try to update set_mempolicy(2) with the procedure outlined in > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/patches.html as well? > Yes, why not ? I'll put a note about it. > Thanks! While you're hacking on this area and everything is familiar to you, I'm sure the man page would benefit from as extensive update as you're willing to do.