From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755522AbaIHXqw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:46:52 -0400 Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.162]:42438 "EHLO resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754034AbaIHXqv (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:46:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:46:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Mel Gorman cc: Tejun Heo , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: Resolve ambiguities in __get_cpu_var/cpumask_var_t -fix In-Reply-To: <20140908220654.GO17501@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20140908220654.GO17501@suse.de> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Mel Gorman wrote: > A commit in linux-next was causing boot to fail and bisection identified > the patch "percpu: Resolve ambiguities in __get_cpu_var/cpumask_var_". > The commit ID is worthless as it's a linux-next commit. One of the changes > in that patch looks very suspicious. Reverting the full patch fixes boot > as does this fixlet. I already acked a patch like this today.