From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751499AbaIJPnz (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:43:55 -0400 Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.165]:49483 "EHLO resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064AbaIJPny (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:43:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:43:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Jiri Kosina cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20140909162114.44b3e98cf925f125e84a8a06@linux-foundation.org> <20140910140759.GC31903@thunk.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote: > Still, I believe that kernel shouldn't be just ignoring kfree(ERR_PTR) > happening. Would something like the below be more acceptable? CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is the wrong debugging option since it is used for object debugging. This kind of patch would need CONFIG_DEBUG_VM I think.