From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752328AbaIJQQw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:52 -0400 Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.165]:55708 "EHLO resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbaIJQQv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:16:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:16:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Andrey Ryabinin cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov , Konstantin Serebryany , Dmitry Chernenkov , Andrey Konovalov , Yuri Gribov , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Sasha Levin , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Andi Kleen , Vegard Nossum , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 04/10] mm: slub: introduce virt_to_obj function. In-Reply-To: <1410359487-31938-5-git-send-email-a.ryabinin@samsung.com> Message-ID: References: <1404905415-9046-1-git-send-email-a.ryabinin@samsung.com> <1410359487-31938-1-git-send-email-a.ryabinin@samsung.com> <1410359487-31938-5-git-send-email-a.ryabinin@samsung.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > virt_to_obj takes kmem_cache address, address of slab page, > address x pointing somewhere inside slab object, > and returns address of the begging of object. This function is SLUB specific. Does it really need to be in slab.h?