From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752061AbaIJQT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:19:28 -0400 Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.211]:39979 "EHLO qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478AbaIJQT0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:19:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:19:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Jason Cooper cc: Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Russell King , Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1 In-Reply-To: <20140910150447.GV30828@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: References: <20140901230728.GM29327@sirena.org.uk> <1627064.QhxvejlWdk@amdc1032> <20140904171123.GD26364@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140909003729.GA11706@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140910150447.GV30828@titan.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Thanks Chris. I'm a bit behind on irqchip stuff, so I may have missed > something here... Did we get Cc'd on the original patch that caused the > regression? I'm fairly certain I haven't seen it to Ack it. This is a trivial fix to the original patch in linux-next that introduced a bug by dropping one level of indirection.