From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sebastian Lackner <sebastian@fds-team.de>,
Anish Bhatt <anish@chelsio.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86_64,entry: Clear NT on entry and speed up switch_to
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 00:21:55 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410010019290.4455@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1412105369.git.luto@amacapital.net>
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Anish Bhatt noticed that user programs can set RFLAGS.NT before
> syscall or sysenter, and the kernel entry code doesn't filter out
> NT. This causes kernel C code and, depending on thread flags, the
> exit slow path to run with NT set.
>
> The former is a little bit scary (imagine calling into EFI with NT
> set), and the latter will fail with #GP and send a spurious SIGSEGV.
>
> One answer would be "don't do that". But the kernel can do better
> here.
>
> These patches, which I'm not completely thrilled by, filter NT on
> all kernel entries. For syscall (both bitnesses), this is free.
> For sysenter, it costs 15 cycles or so. As a consolation prize, we
> can speed up context switches by avoiding saving and restoring flags.
That's a nice reason not to do any of the other ugly variants.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 19:40 Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86_64,entry: Filter RFLAGS.NT on entry from userspace Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 21:39 ` Sebastian Lackner
2014-09-30 21:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 22:23 ` Sebastian Lackner
2014-09-30 22:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-30 22:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 23:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-01 17:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-01 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-30 22:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-01 0:27 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-10-01 0:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86_64: Don't save flags on context switch Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-30 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-09-30 22:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86_64,entry: Clear NT on entry and speed up switch_to Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1410010019290.4455@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anish@chelsio.com \
--cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastian@fds-team.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®