From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755672AbaJUTfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:35:12 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33095 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755139AbaJUTfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:35:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:35:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: John Stultz cc: "pang.xunlei" , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: Fix NTP adjustment mult overflow. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1412838271-11175-1-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, John Stultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > So you adding this just for correctness reasons, not because you > > observed the problem in practice? > > This is my understanding. > > I'll work with Xunlei to make further clarifications to the changelog > to make this more explicit. Ok. I have no objections to the patch itself, just the changelog made my brain go into spiral mode ... Thanks, tglx