From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752582AbbAUJal (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:30:41 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:53193 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751506AbbAUJac (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:30:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:30:07 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Paul E. McKenney" cc: Calvin Owens , Andrew Morton , Joe Perches , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU In-Reply-To: <20150120203022.GR9719@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20150107014906.GA27996@mail.thefacebook.com> <20150107021926.GT5280@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150107165223.GA21555@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150108043329.GB27996@mail.thefacebook.com> <20150108045306.GJ5280@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150108214644.GC27996@mail.thefacebook.com> <20150113184301.GO9719@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150113211618.GA21498@mail.thefacebook.com> <20150120203022.GR9719@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:21:51PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The whole rcu_note_context_switch() in run_ksoftirqd() is silly. > > > > cond_resched() > > __preempt_count_add(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); > > > > __schedule(); > > preempt_disable(); > > rcu_note_context_switch(); > > .... > > > > __preempt_count_sub(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); > > I agree that if should_resched() returns true as assumed above, then there > is no point to invoking rcu_note_context_switch(). However, the case that > this code applies to is when should_resched() returns false, but RCU is > waiting for a quiescent state from the current CPU. In that case, > cond_resched() won't do anything for RCU, and we do need the > rcu_note_context_switch(). So this should be: if (!cond_resched()) rcu_note_context_switch(); Hmm? > Of course, it would be better to avoid the extra RCU work in the common > case where cond_resched() does inovke the scheduler. And that is the > point of the following patch, which uses cond_resched_rcu_qs(). > However, this use of cond_resched_rcu_qs() doesn't work in older > kernels. So Calvin's patch is for backporting, and the follow-up > patch for future kernels. I see. Thanks, tglx