From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756456AbbAZS1B (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:27:01 -0500 Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.33]:56906 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755058AbbAZS07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:26:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:26:57 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Vladimir Davydov cc: Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] slab: zap kmem_cache_shrink return value In-Reply-To: <20150126170418.GC28978@esperanza> Message-ID: References: <20150126170418.GC28978@esperanza> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > __cache_shrink() is used not only in __kmem_cache_shrink(), but also in > SLAB's __kmem_cache_shutdown(), where we do need its return value to > check if the cache is empty. It could be useful to know if a slab is empty. So maybe leave kmem_cache_shrink the way it is and instead fix up slub to return the proper value?