From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755913AbbCFPuI (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:50:08 -0500 Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.40]:34250 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754736AbbCFPuE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:50:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:50:02 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" cc: Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , Jonathan Corbet , Aaron Jones , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, "Andrew G. Morgan" , Mimi Zohar , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Markku Savela , Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V2 In-Reply-To: <20150305171326.GA14998@mail.hallyn.com> Message-ID: References: <20150301233359.GA22196@mail.hallyn.com> <20150305171326.GA14998@mail.hallyn.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > So I'd say drop this change ^ > > > > Then the ambient caps get ignored for a executables that have capabilities > > seton the file? > > Yes. Those are assumed to already know what they're doing. Ok can we get this patch merged now if I do this change (effectively ambient caps for binaries that have no caps set) and deal with the other issues later? This would cover most of the use cases here at least.