From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754798AbbCXStG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:49:06 -0400
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.33]:48500 "EHLO
	resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754087AbbCXStD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:49:03 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:49:00 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ring-buffer: Replace this_cpu_*() with
 __this_cpu_*()
In-Reply-To: <20150319124023.4c1b1094@gandalf.local.home>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1503241347340.32546@gentwo.org>
References: <20150316173154.537b80ee@gandalf.local.home> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1503170049300.9309@gentwo.org> <20150317081341.0f9a8b4c@gandalf.local.home> <20150317101113.32f5618a@gandalf.local.home> <20150317104038.312e73d1@gandalf.local.home>
 <20150317144701.GJ10068@pengutronix.de> <20150317110750.2a0e2b73@gandalf.local.home> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1503191120310.26866@gentwo.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1503191130330.27377@gentwo.org> <20150319124023.4c1b1094@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:33:30 -0500 (CDT)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
>
> > If you are redoing it then please get the comments a bit cleared up. The
>
> What comments should I clear up? This version did not have a comment.
> It just switched this_cpu_* to __this_cpu_*, and also updated a
> variable algorithm.

Ok fine if there is no comment.